BenefitsAdvice
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

FO v SSWP (UC) [2022] UKUT 56 (AAC) Case no: CUC/1792/2020

Go down

FO v SSWP (UC) [2022] UKUT 56 (AAC) Case no: CUC/1792/2020 Empty FO v SSWP (UC) [2022] UKUT 56 (AAC) Case no: CUC/1792/2020

Post by D.Appleby Mon Apr 25, 2022 10:06 am

Useful case

FO v SSWP (UC) [2022] UKUT 56 (AAC)
Case no: CUC/1792/2020
2
REASONS FOR DECISION
The moral of this case
1. This appeal to the Upper Tribunal is a good example of why First-tier Tribunals
may sometimes need to be wary about taking at face value the Department for Work
and Pensions (DWP)’s written submission in response to a claimant’s appeal. This is
especially so where the DWP has been economical with the photocopier.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/624313f4e90e075f07426e2f/CUC_1792_2020_UA_2020_001580.pdf

There's a surprise!!!

D.Appleby

Posts : 165
Points : 254
Reputation : 8
Join date : 2021-02-19

Caker and jobberpw like this post

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum