JSA "new rule" ASE
+2
Jara
Absolut
6 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: JSA "new rule" ASE
Absolut wrote:oneman wrote:About 10 years ago while on JSA. I had an unsigned CC ( my signature missing ) running for about 4 years. I brought the matter up when a sanction was issued but it made no difference. I can't remember why until I dig out my old letters but I think that something else overrides the CC.
What ever you do, never sign over to CC from JSA. It's just too much of a problem if you get a sanction and it is all stacked against you. I was lucky and could afford to ride it out until I won the appeal. Other people may not be able to do this and unfortunately they know this and this is why they want you to change over.
I'm not sure what you mean "never sign over to CC from JSA". Do you mean sign over from JSA to UC?
Yes sorry that is what I meant.
You can't be sanctioned for not coming to an agreement with your workroach over your CC. You can ask for it to go to a DM for a verdict and you can appeal their decision and take it to a tribunal for a final decision. The DM and your roach are not the law and everything in your CC has to be agreed upon. This process also takes time and they nearly always back down before it gets to tribunal.
oneman- Posts : 886
Points : 996
Reputation : 30
Join date : 2017-04-16
jobberpw likes this post
Re: JSA "new rule" ASE
oneman wrote:You can't be sanctioned for not coming to an agreement with your workroach over your CC. You can ask for it to go to a DM for a verdict and you can appeal their decision and take it to a tribunal for a final decision. The DM and your roach are not the law and everything in your CC has to be agreed upon. This process also takes time and they nearly always back down before it gets to tribunal.
Thanks. I'm aware there's a cooling off period and that we can get a DM to look at the CCs if we don't agree with them. I'm hoping it doesn't come to that.
Absolut- Posts : 1054
Points : 1292
Reputation : 163
Join date : 2017-04-21
oneman and jobberpw like this post
Re: JSA "new rule" ASE
Good old DWP. When is an agreement an agreement ...When its only signed by them:roll: .
Dont ya just love em
Dont ya just love em
jobberpw- Posts : 797
Points : 862
Reputation : 29
Join date : 2017-04-30
Age : 66
Location : Roach Ville
Absolut likes this post
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» The Rule of Law: relationship with benefit sanctions
» The Conservatives have imposed ‘direct rule’ over the Scottish and Welsh parliaments
» ‘Senseless’ disability benefit rule costs the NHS at least £7.7 million a year
» Disability benefit cuts will cost taxpayers more than they will save, charity warns
» UK judges rule DWP wrong to deny appeals over refused benefits.
» The Conservatives have imposed ‘direct rule’ over the Scottish and Welsh parliaments
» ‘Senseless’ disability benefit rule costs the NHS at least £7.7 million a year
» Disability benefit cuts will cost taxpayers more than they will save, charity warns
» UK judges rule DWP wrong to deny appeals over refused benefits.
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|