BenefitsAdvice
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

KB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2019] UKUT 408 (AAC)CUC/2274/20181IN THE UPPER TRIBUNALCase No.CUC/2274/2018ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER

2 posters

Go down

KB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2019] UKUT 408 (AAC)CUC/2274/20181IN THE UPPER TRIBUNALCase No.CUC/2274/2018ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER Empty KB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2019] UKUT 408 (AAC)CUC/2274/20181IN THE UPPER TRIBUNALCase No.CUC/2274/2018ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER

Post by Welfare-Champion Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:45 am

Read the full decision in CUC/2274/2018.

Judicial Summary

Claimant’s view that it would be pointless to apply for a vacancy does not amount to a good reason for failing to apply for a vacancy as directed by the Secretary of State.

https://www.gov.uk/administrative-appeals-tribunal-decisions/kb-v-secretary-of-state-for-work-pensions-uc-2019-ukut-408-aac

Welfare-Champion

Posts : 412
Points : 953
Reputation : 49
Join date : 2019-02-01

Back to top Go down

KB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2019] UKUT 408 (AAC)CUC/2274/20181IN THE UPPER TRIBUNALCase No.CUC/2274/2018ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER Empty Re: KB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2019] UKUT 408 (AAC)CUC/2274/20181IN THE UPPER TRIBUNALCase No.CUC/2274/2018ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER

Post by Caker Tue Jan 28, 2020 2:09 pm

It would have been better if she had applied. She would, no doubt, have been rejected at the interview stage if they were looking for someone with an outgoing personality type she would have shown herself to not be that type.
Caker
Caker

Posts : 1819
Points : 2423
Reputation : 270
Join date : 2017-04-14

Back to top Go down

KB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2019] UKUT 408 (AAC)CUC/2274/20181IN THE UPPER TRIBUNALCase No.CUC/2274/2018ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER Empty Re: KB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2019] UKUT 408 (AAC)CUC/2274/20181IN THE UPPER TRIBUNALCase No.CUC/2274/2018ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER

Post by Guest Tue Jan 28, 2020 2:26 pm

I agree Caker. Better to appease these morons at joke shop etc just to shut them up, as using any logical thinking doesn't seem to work.


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

KB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2019] UKUT 408 (AAC)CUC/2274/20181IN THE UPPER TRIBUNALCase No.CUC/2274/2018ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER Empty Re: KB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2019] UKUT 408 (AAC)CUC/2274/20181IN THE UPPER TRIBUNALCase No.CUC/2274/2018ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum