Punishment beatings by public demand - the truth about welfare reform

I could start this with a tragedy, but you've heard it a thousand times. The terminally ill cancer patients found fit for work before dying. The man who had a heart attack during a disability benefit test and was sanctioned for not completing it. The woman who had her benefits sanctioned because her job centre meeting clashed with a job interview. And on and on. You know how this goes.

The legacy of Britain's welfare reform would make its architects permanently unemployable in any functioning political system. But this isn't purely about venal politicians and vindictive newspaper editors. It's about us.

http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2018/06/07/punishment-beatings-by-public-demand-the-truth-about-welfare

there is no due process, no presumption of innocence

That is what I loathe about the DWP - taking common law and reversing it from 'innocent until proven guilty' to guilty until you can prove otherwise.

I found it an interesting read up on the subject

also noted your quoted post as well

I personally dont like another adviser looking at cc under appeal and agreeing with the first adviser, I see it merely as you will do as we say in this jobcenter.

seen way too many advisers abusing this position and even managers refusing whats fact even by foi info