BenefitsAdvice
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Respect and Support for People Claiming Welfare Benefits Self-help, information and advice on how to prevent and challenge benefit sanctions. Support with ESA, PIP claims, the work programme and other mandatory schemes.


IR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2019] UKUT 374 (AAC)

BenefitsAdvice :: Daily impact :: LAW

Go down

IR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2019] UKUT 374 (AAC) Empty IR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2019] UKUT 374 (AAC)

Post by Welfare-Champion Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:56 am

DWP are still unable to issue lawful letters...

IR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2019] UKUT 374 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 3 December 2019.
Published 15 January 2020

From: HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

Decision date:
3 December 2019

Read the full decision in CPIP/2941/2018.

Judicial Summary

Personal independence payment - Failure by claimant to attend Health Care Professional appointment - Whether good reason shown - Tribunal must have sight of appointment letter - Whether Atos letter notifying appointment imposes a mandatory requirement to attend - Remilien, Hooper and Reilly & Wilson considered
Published 15 January 2020

Welfare-Champion

Posts : 412
Points : 953
Reputation : 49
Join date : 2019-02-01

Back to top Go down

IR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2019] UKUT 374 (AAC) Empty Re: IR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2019] UKUT 374 (AAC)

Post by Welfare-Champion Thu Jan 23, 2020 11:46 am


Welfare-Champion

Posts : 412
Points : 953
Reputation : 49
Join date : 2019-02-01

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

BenefitsAdvice :: Daily impact :: LAW

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum